Mrs Rip Van Winkle wrote:
Diana...I do believe there are others....P{ersonally I have all symptoms of MS (I know they very per indivdual) but MRI's do not show mylenization...I can never get that word right. Therefore my Neurologist will not call it MS at this time...however, I have to keep having MRI's to check up on it. I have refuese a spinal tap.
Being treated for the SA is not always about the quality of life but what the SA does to your body if left untreated.
If you do not get answers and your thread starts heading to the bottom of the page...make a post in it saying bumping it up...it will ocme back to the top of the page...may have to do that due to all the posting that is on here and for someone else with MS to see it.
I don't want to get too off topic for my own topic (LOL) ... but here goes.
MS can be an anomaly and can be tough to diagnose. I went through about 1.5 years before an official diagnosis came through -- yet I had symptoms all the way back to the early 1990's (optic neuritis). You would benefit by working with a neurologist who specializes in MS and knows about the "McDonald Criteria". The reason I mention it is because I, too, did not show enhancing lesions on my MRI's (I am getting ready to go for an MRI ... and it's been since 2004). I was diagnosed in 2002 after 6 bouts of optic neuritis and bladder involvement (I use a catheter now). It took a while ... but there are certain patterns that MS typically takes.
Check out my Squidoo lens on the topic ...
http://www.squidoo.com/ms_friends -- it's got a ton of info.
Take care!
Diana